If you're looking at Blackpool for buy-to-let, the areas we consistently point our clients toward are FY1, FY2, FY3, and FY7. These postcodes share the same underlying pattern: lower entry prices than the more coastal, suburban parts of the Fylde Coast, paired with rents that hold up strongly relative to what you pay to buy. That combination, low purchase cost against solid achievable rent, is what actually drives yield, not a postcode's reputation.
A real example, not a hypothetical one. Two of our coaching clients, Janette and Simon, are currently buying a 4-bed terraced house in FY1 for £80,000. It needs around £15,000 spending on it to bring it up to a lettable, modern standard, taking the all-in cost to roughly £95,000. Once the work is done, the property is expected to value at £115,000-£120,000, and a 4-bed in that condition and location rents for £1,000-£1,150 a month.
Run the numbers on that: at the midpoint (£1,075/month rent, £95,000 all-in cost), that's a gross yield of around 13.6%. Even calculated more conservatively against the post-refurbishment value rather than the all-in spend, it's still comfortably above 10%. Those aren't borrowed statistics, that's a real deal, priced today.
Why 4-beds specifically are worth paying attention to. This is the part most generic buy-to-let guides won't tell you, because it's local knowledge, not a spreadsheet stat: across the entire Fylde Coast, there are typically fewer than five 4-bed properties available to rent at any given time. Three-bed properties, by contrast, are in plentiful supply, walk into any letting agent and you'll see plenty of choice. That scarcity at the 4-bed level means less competition for tenants, shorter void periods, and genuine pricing power for landlords who own one, structural undersupply, not a temporary blip.
What this means practically. If you're comparing a 3-bed and a 4-bed in a similar FY postcode at a similar entry price, the 4-bed is very likely the stronger long-term hold, purely because of how thin that segment of the rental market actually is. It's a detail that only shows up if you're actively managing property in these postcodes day to day, not something you'll find in a national buy-to-let ranking table.
Why FY5, FY6, and FY8 don't offer the same numbers. It's not that these areas are worse places to invest, they're simply priced differently, and the rent doesn't scale up to match. Take FY8 (Lytham St Annes) as the clearest example: comparable 4-bed terraced houses currently on the market there are priced at £260,000, £325,000, and £350,000, averaging around £312,000. A similar 4-bed in that area rents for roughly £1,400-£1,800 a month.
Run the same yield calculation: at the midpoint (£312,000 purchase, £1,600/month rent), that's a gross yield of around 6.2%, against the 13.6% on the FY1 example above. That's not a small gap, it's roughly half. You're paying more than three times as much to buy in FY8 for rent that's only around 50% higher, and the FY8 properties are already fully renovated, so there's no refurbishment upside to add on top the way there is with a fixer-upper in FY1.
One factual note: most of FY8 is leasehold rather than freehold, this goes back to historic local land ownership, the Clifton family and the St Annes-on-the-Sea Land & Building Company, who developed the town from the 1870s onward and granted long leases rather than selling the land outright. These leases typically run 900 to 999 years with low or nominal ground rent, so in practice it's rarely a meaningful drag on returns the way a modern leasehold flat can be. Still worth confirming the specific lease terms on any property before buying, but it's a quirk of the area's history, not a red flag.
The takeaway. FY5, FY6, and FY8 are genuinely nicer, more established residential areas, and that's exactly why they cost more to buy into. If your goal is living there yourself, that premium makes sense. If your goal is rental yield, the numbers currently favour FY1, FY2, FY3, and FY7 clearly, and a scarce, undersupplied segment like 4-bed houses makes that gap even more worth paying attention to.
If you're considering a deal like this. Numbers like Janette and Simon's only work if the renovation is costed accurately and the end rent is realistic for the finished property, not the optimistic version. That's exactly where a local, hands-on partner earns their place, on-the-ground pricing, real contractor costs, and knowing what a 4-bed in FY1 actually rents for this month, not last year.
Back to Blog